Posted by & filed under Aggression, Group Processes, Legal Ethical Issues, Persuasion, Social Perception, Social Psychology, Social Psychology.

Description: Discussion and debate about the factors that lead up to the violent actions taken by supporters of Donald Trump in Washington on January 6, 2021 are often wrapped in political stances and loyalties. As the Senate trial of Donald Trump on the single article of impeachment of encouraging insurrection approaches it is useful to step back and consider that there are many examples of people and situations where things were said that may have led to groups taking violent actions. In that, Donald Trump is not new. Common across such nasty historical moments is that speakers do not directly ask or tell their “followers” to go forth and commit violence despite the violence that follows their speeches. So, if they do not directly request or demand violence what does research examining past examples of speech that incited violence indicate may be the factors that causally link the speech with the subsequent violent actions? Think about what might be involved and it may help to think about what was said (and how it was said) by Donald Trump at the Ellipse Park in Washington DC on January 6, 2021 if only because it is a recent example that anyone tracking North American events over the past month or so heard something about. After you have reflected a bit on the possible causal impacts of what was said have a read through the article linked below for some examples of what research into past events suggests.

Source: Incitement to violence is rarely explicit – here are some techniques people use to breed hate. H. Colleen Sinclair, The Conversation.

Date: January 26, 2021

Photo Credit:  Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

Article Link: https://theconversation.com/incitement-to-violence-is-rarely-explicit-here-are-some-techniques-people-use-to-breed-hate-153585

for further application see: https://theconversation.com/at-impeachment-hearing-lawmakers-will-deliberate-over-a-deadly-weapon-used-in-the-attack-on-capitol-hill-president-trumps-words-153074

SO, did the discussion of some of the research into speech that incites violence clarify anything for you regarding recent events? Certainly, we have, over the past 4 years, heard a lot of top-down talk containing aspects of Anger, Contempt and Disgust aimed at other countries, immigrants, and political opponents (both Democrat AND Republican). Donald Trump’s speech of January 6 may be seen to have ticked a lot of the content points discussed in the article. It will be interesting to see where legal, political and general social debate goes with the speech and related actions in the coming weeks and the available research on previous speech/violence links can be rather informative.

Questions for Discussion:

  1. Can a speech contribute to violence without actually containing specific calls to be violent?
  2. What does it mean to “incite” violence and how might we work out issues of moral and legal culpability in such situations?
  3. What areas of Psychology does the research discussed in the article trade in and what other research would be worth doing or at least interesting to do to further expand our understanding of the Psychology of incitement to violence (and how to control it)?

References (Read Further):

United Nations (2018) A New Era of Conflict and Violence, Link

Matsumoto, D., Frank, M. G., & Hwang, H. C. (2015). The role of intergroup emotions in political violence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 369-373. Link

Leader Maynard, J., & Benesch, S. (2016). Dangerous speech and dangerous ideology: An integrated model for monitoring and prevention. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 9(3). Link

Williams, T., & Neilsen, R. (2019). “They will rot the society, rot the party, and rot the army”*: Toxification as an ideology and motivation for perpetrating violence in the Khmer Rouge genocide?. Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(3), 494-515. Link

Marcus, K. L. (2012). Accusation in a Mirror. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 43(2), 357-393. Link

Speech, D., & Sudan, S. Dangerous Speech: A Practical Guide. Link

Faris, R., Ashar, A., Gasser, U., & Joo, D. (2016). Understanding harmful speech online. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, (2016-21). Link

Buyse, A. (2014). Words of violence: Fear speech, or how violent conflict escalation relates to the freedom of expression. Hum. Rts. Q., 36, 779. Link

Bleich, E. (2011). The rise of hate speech and hate crime laws in liberal democracies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(6), 917-934. Link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *